◆Owner-Occupied Investment Property◆ 12% Gross Yield (¥477,600 Annual Income)

While the price (¥3.6M/$24K) and income-generating angle are attention-grabbing, the property is severely undermined by visible structural issues (building tilt), poor photo quality (dark, poorly lit interiors), dated 1982 construction, and the overall worn aesthetic. The few exterior shots show an aging, uninspiring structure with minimal charm or renovation potential appeal. This reads as a cash-flow play for investors, not an interesting akiya story for English-speaking enthusiasts.

Photos are predominantly dim and poorly composed, showing a dated 1980s residential property in visible decline. The entryway shot reveals cramped, utilitarian spaces with worn finishes. Exterior shots show a tired, beige structure surrounded by overgrown landscaping and minimal curb appeal. One balcony photo offers a view but is otherwise unremarkable. No standout architectural features, gardens, or charming details present.

¥3.6M rental property in Japan with instant tenant and 12% yield—but would you buy a building with a structural tilt?

CRITICAL: Building has visible structural tilt (建物に傾きあり). Seller explicitly disclaims liability for defects (契約不適合責任免除). Front road is private with no ownership rights. 1982 construction with only partial 2025 renovations. No parking on-site. Photo quality is poor, obscuring true condition. Tenant-occupied complicates inspection/eviction. High risk for hidden structural/foundation damage requiring expensive repairs.