← Back to listings View on Suumo ↗
¥3,600,000 (~$24,000 USD)

◆Shutters◆Shower◆South-Facing◆Separate Bath & Toilet◆Corner Lot

◆雨戸◆シャワー◆南向き◆バス・トイレ別◆角地
Rank: 30 6/10

Photos (13)

Property photo 1 Property photo 2 Property photo 3 Property photo 4 Property photo 5 Property photo 6 Property photo 7 Property photo 8 Property photo 9 Property photo 10 Property photo 11 Property photo 12 Property photo 13

Property Details

Location
📍 群馬県吾妻郡嬬恋村大字鎌原1504-17
Layout
2DK
Land Area
252.0 m² (2713 sq ft)
Building Area
52.99 m² (570 sq ft)
Year Built
1980 (46 years old)
Nearest Station
大前 (62 min)

Ranking Breakdown (Score: 30)

+15: 13 photos — lots of content
+8: Moderate price: ¥3,600,000
+5: Good lot size: 252.0m²
+2: South-facing

LLM Evaluation

Reasoning
The price (¥3.6M / ~$24k USD) is appealing for an affordable Japan property audience, and the property is clearly livable with updated fixtures (shower, separate bath/toilet). However, the photos are mixed in quality—exterior shots are clear and show a modest but intact structure, but interior photos are poorly lit, cramped, and uninspiring. The small building area (53 sqm) limits visual drama, and the 1980 build year with basic renovations doesn't offer strong aesthetic appeal. It's not unattractive enough to fail, but not photogenic enough to be a standout post.
Visual Assessment
Exterior photos show a small, compact house on a 252 sqm lot with bare earth, winter trees, and basic condition—clean and intact but not charming. Interior shots reveal a cramped 2DK layout with basic tile and wood finishes, modest lighting, and minimal personality. The bathroom photo shows a functional but dated setup. No outstanding visual features; photos are functional documentation rather than compelling imagery.
Suggested Angle
Under $25K for a livable house on a quarter-acre of land in rural Japan—tiny but completely updated and mortgage-ready for international buyers seeking affordable entry into Japanese property ownership.
Red Flags
62-minute commute to nearest station (very isolated); only 53 sqm building area (quite cramped for long-term living); poor interior photo quality may indicate limited renovation/aesthetic upgrades; 1980 build age may mean future structural/maintenance costs; small building footprint limits appeal to families or those seeking expansion potential.
cheap rural affordable livable-condition 2dk separate-bath-toilet mortgage-friendly gunma small-footprint updated-fixtures