← Back to listings View on Suumo ↗
¥3,500,000 (~$23,333 USD)

◆Garden◆Low Traffic Area◆80+ Tsubo Land◆South-Facing Balcony◆Quiet Residential Neighborhood

◆庭◆周辺交通量少なめ◆土地80坪以上◆南面バルコニー◆閑静な住宅地
Rank: 40 4/10

Photos (19)

Property photo 1 Property photo 2 Property photo 3 Property photo 4 Property photo 5 Property photo 6 Property photo 7 Property photo 8 Property photo 9 Property photo 10 Property photo 11 Property photo 12 Property photo 13 Property photo 14 Property photo 15 Property photo 16 Property photo 17 Property photo 18 Property photo 19

Property Details

Location
📍 群馬県安中市東上磯部1837-5
Layout
6DK
Land Area
269.82 m² (2904 sq ft)
Building Area
70.07 m² (754 sq ft)
Year Built
1976 (50 years old)
Nearest Station
磯部 (32 min)

Ranking Breakdown (Score: 40)

+20: 19 photos — excellent coverage
+8: Moderate price: ¥3,500,000
+5: Good lot size: 269.82m²
+7: Very spacious: 6DK

LLM Evaluation

Reasoning
While the price (¥3.5M / ~$23K USD) has shock value for a 6-room house with large land, the property condition severely limits appeal. Photos show dated 1970s construction, heavy wear, unmaintained grounds, sparse furnishings, and a cramped bathroom. The visual quality is poor—dim lighting, cluttered spaces, and an overall sense of abandonment. This reads more as a fixer-upper teardown than a charming akiya, with limited story potential beyond 'extremely cheap.'
Visual Assessment
Photos reveal a tired 1976-built house with peeling exterior paint, overgrown/bare lot, minimal interior furnishings, and a notably cramped bathroom with dated tile. The exteriors show weather damage and lack of curb appeal; interiors are dimly lit and sparse. While there are 19 photos, most fail to showcase any redeeming features. The property appears unmaintained rather than charmingly rustic.
Suggested Angle
¥3.5M for a 6-room house on 270+ sqm of land in Gunma—but buyer beware: this 1970s build needs serious love (and a contractor's estimate).
Red Flags
Significant deferred maintenance visible throughout; dated construction (1976) with wear consistent with 45+ years and apparent vacancy; cramped bathroom suggests poor livability; bare/neglected grounds; 32-minute train commute to nearest station; no obvious structural work mentioned; limited renovation potential may not justify purchase despite low price. Photos do not inspire confidence in structural integrity or livability.
ultra-cheap large-land renovation-needed rural-gunma 1970s-build fixer-upper budget-property