← Back to listings View on Suumo ↗
¥2,000,000 (~$13,333 USD)

Single-family home in Shimomurota (near Nakahara Station) – ¥2,000,000

下室田町(安中榛名駅) 200万円
Rank: 25 3/10

Photos (14)

Property photo 1 Property photo 2 Property photo 3 Property photo 4 Property photo 5 Property photo 6 Property photo 7 Property photo 8 Property photo 9 Property photo 10 Property photo 11 Property photo 12 Property photo 13 Property photo 14

Property Details

Location
📍 群馬県高崎市下室田町1712-5
Layout
2K
Land Area
176.64 m² (1901 sq ft)
Building Area
51.75 m² (557 sq ft)
Year Built
1984 (42 years old)
Nearest Station
安中榛名 (90 min)

Ranking Breakdown (Score: 25)

+15: 14 photos — lots of content
+20: Cheap: ¥2,000,000
-10: Demolition needed/planned

LLM Evaluation

Reasoning
While the price is extremely attractive (¥2M for land + structure), the photo evidence reveals a property in poor condition with visible decay, aged infrastructure, and notably stained/deteriorated interior fixtures. The kitchen and bathroom images show signs of age and grime that read as neglected rather than charmingly rustic. The adjacent building is explicitly noted as having major water damage. Poor photo quality and lack of appealing interior shots make this unappealing for social media despite the bargain price.
Visual Assessment
Photos show a dated 1980s prefab-style building with worn white metal cladding. Interior shots reveal aged, stained pink bathroom tile, a dingy kitchen with red brick walls, visible staining on fixtures, and overall dated/grimy aesthetic. The exterior photos (including an abandoned neighboring structure) do not convey charm or renovation potential—they read as genuinely neglected. No standout photogenic elements; the images would not stop a scroller.
Suggested Angle
Not recommended for social media posting. The property does not meet visual standards for dream-posting to an English-speaking audience fascinated by Japanese real estate—the photos document decay rather than potential.
Red Flags
Explicit mention of significant water damage in adjacent building; primary building shows age-related deterioration and water staining in photos; poor interior condition (stained fixtures, aged tile); 90 minutes from nearest station (very remote); no compelling renovation-ready aesthetic; unclear which structure is actually included in sale; building photos suggest structural/dampness concerns that are expensive to remediate
extreme-budget rural-gunma fixer-upper water-damage dated-1980s large-land not-photogenic