← Back to listings View on Suumo ↗
¥1,800,000 (~$12,000 USD)

Fujimi (Suzuran-no-Sato Station) — ¥1,800,000

富士見(すずらんの里駅) 180万円
Rank: 45 4/10

Photos (7)

Property photo 1 Property photo 2 Property photo 3 Property photo 4 Property photo 5 Property photo 6 Property photo 7

Property Details

Location
📍 長野県諏訪郡富士見町富士見
Layout
2LK
Land Area
407.0 m² (4381 sq ft)
Building Area
40.03 m² (431 sq ft)
Year Built
1935 (91 years old)
Nearest Station
すずらんの里 (10 min)

Ranking Breakdown (Score: 45)

+10: 7 photos
+20: Cheap: ¥1,800,000
+5: Good lot size: 407.0m²
+3: Historic charm potential (1935)
+3: Walkable to station: 10 min
+4: Great value: ¥4,423/m²

LLM Evaluation

Reasoning
While the price (≈$12,000) and generous land area are genuinely compelling, the interior photos are a dealbreaker for social media. The images show dark, cluttered, dingy spaces with poor lighting, accumulated clutter, stained/discolored walls, and an overall neglected appearance. This reads as 'abandoned hoarder house' rather than 'charming rustic renovation project.' The exterior shots are pleasant, but they cannot overcome the depressing interior documentation.
Visual Assessment
Exteriors (photos 1–2) are bright and attractive: a modest red-roofed cottage on overgrown but spacious grounds, clear blue sky, good composition. Interiors (photos 3–5) are severely compromised: murky lighting, clutter, visible grime, stained tatami/walls, and a generally depressing neglected atmosphere. The quality and angle of interior shots make the property look abandoned and unsalvageable rather than potential-rich.
Suggested Angle
Cannot recommend posting. The ¥1.8M price tag on 407 sqm of land near a train station *should* be gold, but the interior photos actively repel rather than attract. A potential post would require professional photography showing cleaned/cleared spaces highlighting the land potential and traditional structure.
Red Flags
Severe interior condition: dark, cluttered, stained walls suggest long abandonment, possible mold/water damage, structural concerns not visible. No inspection report provided. 1935 construction = seismic/structural assessment critical. Cluttered interiors suggest significant cleanup/demolition costs not reflected in price. Photos suggest this is a tear-down or major reconstruction project, not a livable fixer-upper.
akiya cheap-land rural-japan nagano train-access large-plot needs-renovation traditional-home